Sumac-rose water mouthwash versus benzydamine to prevent radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancers: a phase II randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Radiation-induced oral mucositis (OM) largely impairs the quality of life (QoL) of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Few choices with limited efficacy are available to prevent this adverse effect. This randomized trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of benzydamine (standard) and a new combination (sumac and rose water) in preventing radiation-induced OM. METHODS: This was a phase II, triple-blind, active-controlled, randomized trial. The primary endpoint was OM, and the secondary endpoints were oral pain and QoL. Besides, the possible variables defining the outcomes were analyzed using the chi-squared test (univariate analysis) and binomial regression model (multivariate analysis). RESULTS: Sumac-rose group had fewer high-grade OM (33% vs. 63%, odds ratio [OR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI 95%] 0.08-0.93, P = 0.03) and better QoL (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed these findings. Sumac-rose rinsing could also postpone the start of oral pain (hazard ratio [HR] 0.02, CI 95% 0.001-0.32, P = 0.001) and high-grade OM (HR 0.28, P = 0.03) compared with benzydamine. CONCLUSIONS: The sumac-rose group had a lower OM rate and grade and higher QoL than the benzydamine group. In addition, the experimental group developed high-grade OM and oral pain later during the radiotherapy course. Further studies need to be conducted to assess the role of sumac and rose water in reducing grade 3-4 mucositis in patients who undergo chemoradiation for head and neck cancer.

Effects of Herbal Medicines on the Prevention and Treatment of Contact Dermatitis: A Systematic Review.

Background: Contact dermatitis (CD) is a common inflammatory disease of the skin. CD has a complex and multifaceted treatment, and one of the main components of CD treatment is inflammation management. We summarized the clinical trials exploring the effects of herbal medicine on patients with CD. Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching four databases. Clinical trials in English investigating the effect of herbal medicines on CD prevention and treatment published from 2010 to 2020 were reviewed. This study was conducted based on the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Nine clinical trials examining the effects of herbs on CD were identified. A total of 450 patients participated in these studies. Herbal medicines used in the reviewed studies were in various forms. Almost all the studies showed that these herbs were useful in preventing and treating CD. Regarding the side effects of the herbal medicines, few complications such as erythema and papules as well as positive chronotropic effects were reported. Conclusion: Evidence showed that herbal medicines were effective in preventing and treating CD by reducing the inflammation level and increasing antioxidant defense. However, the number of clinical trials was low to draw definitive conclusions. Moreover, the studies were not homogeneous and differed regarding methodology, evaluation tools, and quality. Also, in these studies, the interactions and safety of the herbal medicines were not considered adequately. Therefore, well-designed evidence is required to draw definitive conclusions in this regard.

Effect of Honey-Lemon Spray Versus Benzydamine Hydrochloride Spray on Radiation-Induced Acute Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Pilot, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Introduction: Oral mucositis (OM) is the most prevalent side effect in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). It causes an obvious decrease in quality of life (QoL) in these patients, so different medications have been recommended for OM, however, without optimal response. This randomized trial aimed to assess the effects of a honey-lemon spray compared with benzydamine hydrochloride in prevention of radiation-induced OM in patients with HNC. Materials and Methods: Forty-six patients with HNC received external beam radiotherapy for 5 days per week. Patients were randomized to treatment with either benzydamine hydrochloride spray or honey-lemon spray for 5 weeks and continued for 1 week after the end of treatment. The oral cavity was examined weekly, with a score given to each site based on the degree of mucositis using a 4-point scale, and a mean mucositis score was calculated as the primary outcome. Occurrence of OM, pain, QoL, and adverse effects were defined as secondary outcomes. Patients, therapists, and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. Results: No significant group differences occurred in the mucositis score, pain, or QoL. Mucositis occurrence rates were higher in the benzydamine hydrochloride group compared with the honey-lemon group (hazard ratio = 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 4.2). Two patients in the honey-lemon group had mild nausea and burning throat; no adverse effects occurred in the benzydamine hydrochloride group. Conclusions: There were no significant group differences in mucositis severity between patients treated with honey-lemon spray and benzydamine hydrochloride. The potential preventive effects of honey-lemon spray need to be confirmed in further trials. The trial registration number is IRCT20161024030467N1.